INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS XIBMS MBA EXAM ANSWER SHEET
SUB: International
Business.
International Business
Section A (8 Marks Each
Question) ( Attempt any 5 )
1. What are basic differences between domestic and
international business?
No
|
International Business
|
Domestic Business
|
1.
|
It is extension of Domestic Business and
Marketing Principles remain same.
|
The Domestic Business Follow the
marketing Principles
|
2.
|
Difference is customs, cultural factors
|
No such difference. In a large countries
languages likeIndia, we have many languages.
|
3.
|
Conduct and selling procedure changes
|
Selling Procedures remain unaltered
|
4.
|
Working environment and management
practices change to suit local conditions.
|
No such changes are necessary
|
5.
|
Will have to face restrictions in trade
practices, licenses and government rules.
|
These have little or no impact on
Domestic trade.
|
6.
|
Long Distances and hence more transaction
time.
|
Short Distances, quick business is
possible.
|
7.
|
Currency, interest rates, taxation,
inflation and economy have impact on trade.
|
Currency, interest rates, taxation,
inflation and economy have little or no impact on Domestic Trade.
|
8.
|
MNC’s have perfected principles,
procedures and practices at international level
|
No such experience or exposure.
|
9.
|
MNCs take advantage of location economies
wherever cheaper resources available.
|
No such advantage once plant is built it
cannot be easily shifted.
|
10.
|
Large companies enjoy benefits of
experience curve
|
It is possible to get this benefit
through collaborators.
|
11.
|
High Volume cost advantage.
|
Cost Advantage by automation, new methods
etc.
|
12.
|
Global Standardization
|
No such advantage
|
13.
|
Global business seeks to create new
values and global brand image.
|
No such advantage
|
14.
|
Can Shift production bases to different
countries whenever there are problems in taxes or markets
|
No such advantage and get competition
from some spurious or SSI Unit who get patronage of Government.
|
2. While some see globalization as the avenue to the
development of poor nations, others see it intensifying misery and
inequalities. Critically examine the above statement in today's context?
3. Explain - Localisation of global strategy
4. Explain - Technology contracting (licensing) as an
alternative to FDI or ownership strategy.
5. Explain - Major factors contributing to the success of
international strategic alliances.
There are three main
success factors that plays a role in International Strategic Alliances. They
are Partner Choice, Alliance Composition and Managing the alliance.
Partner Choice
An effective partner
helps the firm achieve its strategic goals, which can be market
access, sharing of costs and risks, or gaining access to critical core competencies. In other words, the partner must have capabilities that the firm lacks and that it values.
access, sharing of costs and risks, or gaining access to critical core competencies. In other words, the partner must have capabilities that the firm lacks and that it values.
A good partner also
shares the firm’s vision for the purpose of the alliance. A final aspect of a
good partner, is one that would be unlikely to try to opportunistically exploit
the alliance for its own ends; to rob the firm of its technological know-how
while giving away little in return.
The suggestions listed
above can be achieved by basing the selection decision on information obtained
from former employees, investment bankers or other firms that entered an
alliance with the potential partner previously.
Alliances and partner
selection are of critical importance and inexperienced organisations often fail
to pay enough attention to this, concentrating on their objectives and
rationales instead of building a mutually beneficial partnership based on
understanding of each other.
Alliance Composition
The alliance should be
structured so that the firm’s risks of giving too much away to the partner are
reduced to an acceptable level. By implementing the following principles in the
alliance, the desired outcome could be achieved:
·
Alliances
should make it difficult or impossible to transfer technology that was not
meant to be transferred.
·
Contractual
safeguards can be written into an alliance agreement to guard against the risk
of opportunism by a partner.
·
Both
parties can agree in advance to substitute skills and technologies, ensuring a
chance for equitable gain.
The risk of opportunism
can be reduced, if the firm extracts a significant credible commitment from its
partner in advance. For example, investment in a 50/50 Joint Venture
constitutes a significant investment in people, equipment and facilities and
motivates the partner to make the alliance work.
Managing the Alliance
The main factor that
promotes successful partnerships, is to maximize the benefits from
the alliance. One of the most prominent issues when dealing with a foreign partner, is cultural differences. Many differences in management style are attributable to cultural differences, and managers need to make allowances for these in dealing with their partner. There is also believed to be two other contributing factors to the successful managing of the alliance, building trust between partners and learning from partners.
the alliance. One of the most prominent issues when dealing with a foreign partner, is cultural differences. Many differences in management style are attributable to cultural differences, and managers need to make allowances for these in dealing with their partner. There is also believed to be two other contributing factors to the successful managing of the alliance, building trust between partners and learning from partners.
Managing an alliance
successful requires building interpersonal relationships between the firm’s
managers, also known as “relational capital”. This helps to build trust and
facilitate harmonious relations between the firms. Personal relationships also
foster an informal management network between the firm.
6. Explain the role of “Power Distance" in
understanding Hofsted's work on cross-cultural prospective. How does this help
in managing international environment?
7. Discuss the relationship between an MNE and its
subsidiaries in the context of the "make or buy" decision. What are
the implications so far as the organization structure/design is concerned?
8. Explain the role of bargaining power" in managing
negotiations in international business.
Bargaining power is a form of interaction through which
individuals, organizations, and governments explicitly try to arrange (or
pretend to do so) a new combination of some of their common and conflicting
interests. Two types of common interests can be distinguished: (1) an identical
common interest in a single arrangement or object which the parties can bring
about only, or more easily, by joining together and (2) a complementary
interest in an exchange of different objects which the parties cannot obtain by
themselves but can only grant to each other.
To realize an identical common interest the parties must
agree on the characteristics of the arrangement (concerning which they may have
different preferences) and on the division of gains and costs (where their
interests usually conflict).
Two nations jointly constructing a dam and two corporations
merging into a single firm are examples of such arrangements. Complementary
interests are realized through barters, sales, or agreements on mutual tariff
concessions. Most international negotiations embrace a combination of identical
common interests and complementary interests, whereas business negotiations are
predominantly concerned with complementary interests.
The parties may relate their conflicts and common interests
explicitly or tacitly. The term “negotiation” usually refers to the explicit
process, with proposals and counterproposals. “Tacit bargaining”occurs if the
parties deliberately arrange a new combination of common and conflicting
interests through hints and guesswork, without explicitly proposing terms for
agreement. Tacit bargaining is of great importance in military confrontations,
when negotiation may be difficult because of incompatible war aims, domestic
opinion, or the lack of diplomatic relations. Tacit bargaining can help to keep
the area of hostilities limited, restrain the use of force, and prepare the
ground for negotiations to terminate hostilities. These functions of tacit
bargaining received little detailed attention until the 1950s, when they were
analyzed in connection with studies of limited war, arms control, and military
deterrence (Schelling 1960). Negotiation, by contrast, is necessary for more
complicated forms of collaboration, for most exchanges, and for any arrangement
where an explicit agreement is essential.
No comments:
Post a Comment